Posts
Most contemporary artists are remarkably docile about this, and many are in collusion. It's much easier than fighting it. So they trumpet "courageous" installations of stained panties or rows of empty rooms, insisting these are remarkably "transgressive" to the culture. Not only are most irrelevant, but if it weren't for the crowds and cocktails at openings, they would be terrifically dull.
image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2017/04/4-6-17-in_the_belly_of_the_beast_jack_larson.jpg
"In the Belly of the Beast" by Jack Larson – acrylic 24″X36″ – no date – from DeviantArt.com
Abortion is real, raw, bloody and painful – and it's happening on a massive scale. Yet as a social and moral issue, abortion has gone almost untouched in the arts since it was unleashed in 1973. Only the truly zealous bother with it at all. From that small lot, pro-aborts alone receive funding, publicity and encouragement from institutions and the state. Bloody acolytes and Planned Parenthood proxies, they essentially advertise for abortion using the arts.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2017/04/the-raw-bloody-subject-most-artists-wont-touch/#vV2XHhBTUV3JtQWT.99
